home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- BUSINESS, Page 49Business NotesCORPORATE IMAGEOn Second Thought . . .
-
-
-
- Maybe it wasn't such a good idea after all. Procter & Gamble
- brass thought they had a right, based on an obscure Ohio law, to
- use local authorities in their hunt for corporate leaks. What
- they didn't foresee was that the company would come out looking
- so bad. After two insider-sourced stories saying P&G's food
- division was troubled appeared in the Wall Street Journal last
- June, P&G complained to Cincinnati police, who examined hundreds
- of thousands of local phone records to see who called the home
- and office of Alecia Swasy, who wrote the articles.
-
- No one was prosecuted, but P&G found itself buried under
- a barrage of negative publicity -- so much so that last week P&G
- chairman Edwin Artzt circulated a letter to employees calling
- the situation an "embarrassing experience." P&G, he admitted,
- had "made an error in judgment" in pursuing police assistance
- and "triggered reactions that reflected negatively on the
- company." Said Artzt: "We created a problem larger than the one
- we were trying to solve." Still, he stressed the need to protect
- company information and asked employees to be "more diligent"
- in doing so.
-
-
-
-
-
-